<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Microsoft went wrong with Active Directory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ldapguru.com/2009/11/how-microsoft-went-wrong-with-active-directory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ldapguru.com/2009/11/how-microsoft-went-wrong-with-active-directory/</link>
	<description>Do it right the first time around.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 05:20:41 +0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.ldapguru.com/2009/11/how-microsoft-went-wrong-with-active-directory/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldapguru.php5.dev.justwebit.ru/?p=13#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Re: How Microsoft went wrong with Active Directory (Score: 1)
http://www.elbrus.ru/~kvk
I think,
1. The AD solution is not optimized/ready to store non-user management information.
2. AD dosn\&#039;t scale well in enterprise environment where other LDAP/X500 servers are implemented with single hierarchy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: How Microsoft went wrong with Active Directory (Score: 1)<br />
<a href="http://www.elbrus.ru/~kvk" rel="nofollow">http://www.elbrus.ru/~kvk</a><br />
I think,<br />
1. The AD solution is not optimized/ready to store non-user management information.<br />
2. AD dosn\&#8217;t scale well in enterprise environment where other LDAP/X500 servers are implemented with single hierarchy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
